What Supervisors Are Signalling
- Elaine Ramsay
- Jan 5
- 2 min read
Updated: 3 hours ago
How AML CFT supervisors respond to non-compliance

Recent Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) cases, including those involving Pagemark Limited and Lexington Trust Services Limited, show how enforcement powers are applied in practice. Supervisors are equipped with a range of measures to correct behaviour, protect the financial system, and maintain sector standards.
This enforcement approach will sit within a changing supervisory structure. Under the announced single supervisor model, DIA will become the sole AML CFT supervisor from 1 July 2026. The underlying expectations, however, are already visible in current supervisory behaviour and recent enforcement outcomes.
Evidence from recent cases
Published enforcement outcomes show how supervisors respond when core AML CFT obligations are missing or weak. Business restrictions and formal action can follow from basic compliance failures, including:
· An absent or non-compliant risk assessment
· An absent or non-compliant AML and CFT programme
· Failures to report when required
Official measures under the AML CFT Act
Supervisory responses are graduated. Measures commonly referenced in public outcomes and guidance include:
Guidance and education for early-stage gaps where remediation is practical
Formal warnings and notices setting out expectations and timeframes for corrective action
Enforceable undertakings with binding commitments, monitoring, and public visibility
Infringement notices for certain lower-level breaches where an infringement pathway exists
Civil proceedings seeking court-ordered penalties and other orders
Criminal proceedings for the most serious misconduct where statutory thresholds are met
Public disclosure of outcomes to promote transparency and deterrence
Key themes for reporting entities
Non-compliance alone can lead to supervisory action, even where no underlying money laundering is alleged
Oversight cannot be delegated. Leadership remains responsible for AML and CFT outcomes
Remediation is expected to be active and evidenced, not theoretical
DIA will escalate where gaps are repeated, prolonged, or foundational
Practical test
If a supervisor arrived tomorrow, could you show:
Your current risk assessment
Your AML and CFT programme
Records showing how the programme is implemented in practice
Examples of monitoring decisions and reporting outcomes
Effective compliance preserves trust, reputation, and the integrity of the financial system.




Comments