AML Health Check: A quick self-assessment for reporting entities
- Elaine Ramsay
- Mar 14
- 2 min read
This short checklist is designed to help law firms quickly assess whether their AML/CFT framework remains aligned with current supervisory expectations.
1. Risk Assessment
Has your AML/CFT Risk Assessment been reviewed to reflect the 2024 National Risk Assessment and recent DIA guidance?
Does it accurately reflect the types of clients, services, and transactions your firm actually undertakes?
Is there a clear connection between your identified risks and the controls described in your Compliance Programme?
2. Compliance Programme
Does the Compliance Programme reflect how the firm actually operates in practice, not just what is written on paper?
Are procedures clear on when standard, simplified, or enhanced CDD should be applied?
Does the programme clearly describe monitoring and escalation procedures?
3. Customer Due Diligence (CDD)
Are beneficial ownership and control persons consistently identified and verified?
Is there a documented approach for source of funds and source of wealth where appropriate?
Are non-face-to-face clients and overseas clients treated with the appropriate level of scrutiny?
4. Ongoing Monitoring
Does the firm actively monitor high-risk clients, transactions, and matters, rather than relying solely on onboarding checks?
Are risk ratings periodically reviewed, particularly when new matters arise?
Can the firm demonstrate how unusual activity would be identified and escalated internally?
5. Independent Audit
Has the firm’s AML/CFT independent audit been completed within the last three years?
Have audit findings been addressed and documented?
Is there evidence that the Risk Assessment and Compliance Programme have been updated following the audit?
6. Staff Training and Awareness
Do lawyers and staff understand which legal services trigger AML obligations?
Is training conducted regularly and documented?
Do staff know how to recognise and escalate suspicious activity?
7. Governance and Oversight
Is there clear oversight from the AML Compliance Officer and senior management?
Are AML obligations embedded in the firm’s daily practice, rather than treated as a compliance exercise?



Comments